One-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in thoracic patients.

BACKGROUND: Lung isolation is a technique used in a multitude of surgeries to ensure single-lung ventilation with collapse of the contralateral lung, as to achieve improved access and visualization of relevant anatomical structures. Despite being accepted and having favorable outcomes, bronchial blockers (BBs) are not to this day the main device of choice among anaesthesiologists. METHODS: In this retrospective and descriptive study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of a BB in all types of thoracic surgeries in our centre between 2015 and 2022, excluding patients with massive hemoptysis or empyema, or who had undergone a prior pneumonectomy. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients were intervened due to lung cancer (67.9%), respiratory disease (23.9%), and non-respiratory disease (8.2%) undergoing lung surgeries (65.7%), pleural and mediastinal surgeries (29.9%), chest wall surgeries (3.0%) and other surgeries (1.5%). In most cases, lung collapse was considered excellent (63.9%) or good (33.1%) with only 4 cases (3.0%) of poor lung collapse. More than 90% of patients did not present intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. No statistically significant differences were found between lung collapse and the demographic, clinical or BB-related variables (p > 0.05). However, we found a significatively higher proportion of excellent lung collapses in VATS surgeries and lateral decubitus positioning, as well as a significatively less proportion of poor lung collapses (p < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significantly higher proportion of excellent lung collapses when the BB was placed in the left bronchus (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With these results, in our experience BBs constitute an effective alternative, capable of achieving pulmonary collapse in all kinds of thoracic procedures with satisfactory safety rates due to their minimal complications.

Modified technique for endobronchial blocker placement in pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: One lung ventilation (OLV) in small children can be achieved using an Arndt endobronchial blocker (AEBB), but it presents challenges. OLV during thoracic procedures provides better surgical conditions and postoperative outcomes. AIM: To report a novel technique to improve placement and repositioning of an extraluminal AEBB for OLV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe how an angled wire is successfully used for extraluminal AEBB placement in pediatric thoracic procedures. DISCUSSION: Since 2017, we have successfully used this technic in over 50 infants and toddlers and overcome challenges of the classic OLV in this age group. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique allows for fast, safe, and reliable OLV while maintaining the ability to reposition the AEBB.

Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube vs EZ-Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background. The EZ-Blocker is the newest generation of bronchial blocker and offers a potential alternative to left-sided double lumen tubes for lung isolation and one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. Methods. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing left-sided double lumen tube to the EZ-Blocker for one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. The time for placement, incidence of intraoperative displacement, and surgeons' rating of lung collapse quality were designated as coprimary outcomes. The safety profiles of the two devices, including the incidence of airway trauma and post-extubation discomfort were also examined. Results. Six randomized controlled trials (495 patients) were analyzed. Compared to the EZ-Blocker, the left-sided double lumen tube was faster to place by a weighted mean difference of [95% CI] of -61.24 seconds [-102.48, -20.00] (P = .004) and was much less likely to become displaced during lung isolation with an odds ratio [95% CI] of .56 [.34, .91] (P = .02). The left-sided double lumen tube and the EZ-Blocker provided similar surgeon-rated quality of lung isolation. Although the left-sided double lumen tube caused a greater degree of post-extubation sore throat, there was a similar incidence of carinal trauma and post-extubation hoarseness compared to the EZ-Blocker. Conclusion. Our analysis suggests that the left-sided double lumen tube can be placed more quickly and is less prone to intraoperative displacement compared to the EZ-Blocker; the quality of lung collapse is similar. Thus, evidence appears to support the continued utilization of the left-sided double lumen tube for routine thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.

Pleural abrasion versus apical pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical approach is the most effective treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The two most widely adopted surgical methods are mechanical abrasion and apical pleurectomy, in addition to bullectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine which technique is superior in treating primary spontaneous pneumothorax. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 to September 2022 comparing mechanical abrasion and apical pleurectomy for treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The primary outcome was pneumothorax recurrence. Secondary outcomes included post-operative chest tube duration, hospital length of stay, operative time and intra-operative of blood loss. RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible for inclusion involving 1,613 patients. There was no difference in the rate of pneumothorax recurrence between pleural abrasion and pleurectomy (RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.92). However, pleural abrasion led to shorter hospital length of stay (MD: -0.25; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.00), post-operative chest tube duration (MD: -0.30; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.03), operative time (MD: -13.00; 95% CI -15.07 to 10.92) and less surgical blood loss (MD: -17.77; 95% CI: -24.36 to -11.18). CONCLUSION: Pleural abrasion leads to less perioperative patient burden and shorter hospital length of stay without compromising the rate of pneumothorax recurrence when compared to pleurectomy. Thus, pleural abrasion is a reasonable first choice surgical procedure for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Factors reducing psychological satisfaction after the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: We examined patient satisfaction with postoperative chest appearance after Nuss procedure and analyzed the factors for postoperative low satisfaction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 133 patients who underwent the Nuss procedure from 2000 to 2016. Their medical records, X-rays, and computed tomography scans were evaluated. Haller index and concave rate were used as objective indices of the deformity. The questionnaires were used to evaluate satisfaction with the chest appearance by a linear scale including five markers (1: dissatisfaction, 5: satisfaction). The patients were divided into two groups: the low satisfaction (score = 1, 2) and the high satisfaction (score = 3-5). RESULTS: The median age during the Nuss procedure was 7.6 (interquartile range, 5.8-12.8) years. Out of 133, 65 patients replied, and the mean postoperative satisfaction score was 3.8 ± 0.2. Out of the 65 respondents, 16 patients (24.6%) were classified as low satisfaction group. Haller index and concave rate were significantly higher and the previous instances of chest operation history were more frequent in the low satisfaction group than in the high satisfaction group, although there was no significant intergroup difference in terms of the postoperative concave rate. CONCLUSIONS: Severe deformity and previous chest operation history were considered to be factors for low satisfaction.

Retrospective study of outcomes after extended resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare, slow-growing malignancy with a considerable propensity for local extension that may require complex airway resection to achieve tumor-free margins. The objective of this study was to assess whether our experience supports complex airway resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma at our institution between 1970 and 2019 were included retrospectively and classified as having had complex or standard resection. Complex surgery included total tracheal replacement, associated esophageal resection, pneumonectomy, total laryngectomy with tracheal resection, and carinal resection. Standard surgery included tracheal resection, bronchoplastic resection, lobectomy, and bilobectomy. We obtained data from medical records, referring physicians, patients, relatives, and public death records. RESULTS: Of 59 included patients, 38 had complex and 21 had standard surgery. All 4 (6.8%) patients who died postoperatively had undergone complex surgery. Postoperative morbidity was 32.2% overall and was significantly higher after complex surgery (P = .043). Overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 81.5% and 60.2%, with no significant differences between groups (P = .31). By univariate analysis, T4 tumor and microscopically detectable tumor in the operative specimen margins and gross tumor in the operative specimen margins were associated with poorer survival (P < .05). In the subgroup with microscopically detectable tumor resection, survival was significantly better with adjuvant radiotherapy (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Complex resection for extended tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma may achieve local control and satisfying long-term survival. However, this demanding procedure is associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Because adjuvant radiotherapy improved outcomes after resection resulting in microscopically detectable tumor in the operative specimen margins, expected outcomes after resection with no detectable tumor in the margins must be compared to those after resection resulting in microscopically detectable tumor in the margins plus radiotherapy, according to the operative risk.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: The use of mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in lung transplantation has been steadily increasing over the prior decade, with evolving strategies for incorporating support in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. There is significant practice variability in the use of these techniques, however, and relatively limited data to help establish institutional protocols. The objective of the AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) expert panel was to review the existing literature and establish recommendations about the use of MCS before, during, and after lung transplantation. METHODS: The AATS CPSC assembled an expert panel of 16 lung transplantation physicians who developed a consensus document of recommendations. The panel was broken into subgroups focused on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative support, and each subgroup performed a focused literature review. These subgroups formulated recommendation statements for each subtopic, which were evaluated by the entire group. The statements were then developed via discussion among the panel and refined until consensus was achieved on each statement. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on 36 recommendations for how and when to use MCS in lung transplantation. These recommendations included the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridging strategy in the preoperative setting, a preference for central veno-arterial ECMO over traditional cardiopulmonary bypass during the transplantation procedure, and the benefit of supporting selected patients with MCS postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving optimal results in lung transplantation requires the use of a wide range of strategies. MCS provides an important mechanism for helping these critically ill patients through the peritransplantation period. Despite the complex nature of the decision making process in the treatment of these patients, the expert panel was able to achieve consensus on 36 recommendations. These recommendations should provide guidance for professionals involved in the care of end-stage lung disease patients considered for transplantation.

Thoracic anaesthetic research: 90 years of sustained progress.

Over the 90 years since the first description of one-lung ventilation, the practice of thoracic surgery and anaesthesia continues to develop. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are increasingly being used to minimise the surgical insult and facilitate improved outcomes. Challenging these outcomes, however, are parallel changes in patient characteristics with more older and sicker patients undergoing surgery. Thoracic anaesthesia as a speciality continues to respond to these challenges with evolution of practice and strong academic performance.

Efficacy of chest X-rays after drain removal in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chest X-rays are routinely obtained after the removal of chest drains in patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgical procedures. However, a lack of guidelines and evidence could question the practice. Routine chest X-rays increase exposure to ionizing radiation, increase health-care costs, and lead to overutilisation of available resources. This review aims to explore the evidence in the literature regarding the routine use of chest X-rays following the removal of chest drains. MATERIALS & METHOD: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline via Ovid, Cochrane central register of control trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials. gov without any limit on the publication year. The references of the included studies are manually screened to identify potentially eligible studies. RESULTS: A total of 375 studies were retrieved through the search and 18 studies were included in the review. Incidence of pneumothorax remains less than 10% across adult cardiac, and pediatric cardiac and thoracic surgical populations. The incidence may be as high as 50% in adult thoracic surgical patients. However, the reintervention rate remains less than 2% across the populations. Development of respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms can adequately guide for a chest X-ray following the drain removal. As an alternative, bedside ultrasound can be used to detect pneumothorax in the thorax after the removal of a chest drain without the need for ionizing radiation. CONCLUSION: A routine chest X-ray following chest drain removal in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgery is not necessary. It can be omitted without compromising patient safety. Obtaining a chest X-ray should be clinically guided. Alternatively, bedside ultrasound can be used for the same purpose without the need for radiation exposure.

Assessing Provider Adherence To A Lung Protective Ventilation Protocol In Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery Using One-Lung Ventilation.

Patients undergoing one-lung ventilation (OLV) are at risk for lung injury leading to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Lung protective ventilation (LPV) challenges traditional anesthetic management by using lower tidal volumes, individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and recruitment maneuvers (RMs). LPV reduces driving pressure when properly applied, which reduces the incidence of PPCs. An LPV protocol was developed and implemented for this study for patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. Knowledge and confidence were measured prior to, immediately following, and 12 weeks after an educational offering and distribution of cognitive aids. Clinical data were collected 12 weeks prior to implementation, immediately after implementation, and again at 12 weeks post-implementation. There was a significant increase in provider knowledge regarding LPV (P = .015). A significant adherence to monitoring driving pressures (P < .05) was observed at 12 weeks post-implementation. There were increases in adherence to each component (tidal volume, PEEP, RM, and FiO2) as well as overall adherence (P = .356). Implementation of the protocol resulted in increased adherence to lung protective strategies, including a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.05) in driving pressure which has been shown to reduce complications in patients having thoracic surgery with OLV.

A comparison between bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes for patients undergoing lung resection: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of bronchial blockers (BB) and double-lumen tubes (DLT) on patients' postoperative recovery after lung resection. Method: 4,636 patients undergoing lung resection and receiving either BB or DLT intubation were reviewed and matched using the propensity score matching method. The primary outcome was the surgical duration. The secondary outcomes included diagnostic results of postoperative chest X-ray, postoperative oxygenation index, incidence of hypercapnia, hypoxemia and sore throat, chest tube duration, incidence of ICU admission, length of hospital stay and incidence of the 30-day readmission. Results: After matching, 401 patients receiving BB were matched to 3,439 patients receiving DLT. There was no statistical difference on the surgical duration between the two groups (P>0.05). However, compared with the DLT group, patients in the BB group showed more infiltrate especially at the surgery side (14.96% versus 9.07%, P<0.001) based on the chest X-ray, together with higher incidence of ICU admission (5.23% versus 2.61%, P<0.05). Additionally, no statistical differences were found between the two groups about chest tube duration, oxygenation index, incidence of hypercapnia, hypoxemia and sore throat, duration of surgery, hospital stays and 30-day readmission (P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the DLT, patients receiving BB technique tend to have increased pulmonary infiltrate (especially the surgery side) and higher incidence of ICU admission at the early post-operative stage, which may have an influence on the patients' recovery.

Immersive Three-dimensional Computed Tomography to Plan Chest Wall Resection for Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Chest wall resections for lung cancer treatment remain difficult to plan using standard 2-dimensional computed tomography. Although virtual reality headsets have been used in many medical contexts, they have not been used in chest wall resection planning. DESCRIPTION: We compared preoperative planning of a chest wall surgical resection for lung cancer treatment between senior and resident surgeons who used an immersive virtual reality device and a 2-dimensional computed tomography. EVALUATION: Chest wall resection planning was more accurate when surgeons used virtual reality vs computed tomography analysis (28.6% vs 18.3%, P = .018), and this was particularly true in the resident surgeon group (27.4% vs 8.3%, P = .0025). Predictions regarding the need for chest wall substitutes were also more accurate when they were made using virtual reality vs computed tomography analysis in all groups (96% vs 68.5%, P < .0001). Other studied parameters were not affected by the use of the virtual reality tool. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality may offer enhanced accuracy for chest wall resection and reconstruction planning for lung cancer treatment.

The Use of Extracorporeal Support to Rescue Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Following Thoracic Surgery.

Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following a general thoracic procedure is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) offers an alternate means of cardiopulmonary support in the setting of refractory respiratory failure. We report indications and outcomes patients who after complex general thoracic surgery developed ARDS requiring ECMO support. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients requiring venovenous (VV) ECMO support in the postoperative period following a general thoracic surgical procedure from January 2011 to December 2019. Exclusion criteria include those who underwent a cardiac procedure, venoarterial (VA) ECMO, cardiothoracic transplantation, or required ECMO only for intraoperative support. Forty instances of postoperative VV ECMO were utilized in patients who underwent a surgery with the thoracic surgical service. Lung procedures were the most common index operations performed (45%) followed by esophageal procedures (40%). Mean time to ECMO initiation from the index operation was 5.45 days with a range of 0 days to 1.3 months. Median length of ECMO support was 9.41 days with a range of 12 hours to 33 days. Patients were cannulated in an elective (70%) or emergent (30%) fashion. ECMO-related complications included a major bleeding event in seven patients. Thirty day survival was 62.5% for the entire cohort and 52.5% of patients were discharged from the hospital and 80.95% of these patients were still alive 90 days after discharge. ECMO is a viable means of cardiopulmonary support that can provide a survival advantage for patients who experience severe refractory respiratory failure following a complex general thoracic surgery.

Comparison of left double lumen tube and y-shaped and double-ended bronchial blocker for one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery-a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Double lumen tube (DLT) intubation is the most commonly used technique for one lung ventilation. Bronchial blockers (BB) are an alternative, especially for difficult airways. The EZ-bronchial blocker (EZB) is an innovative y-shaped and double-ended device of the BB family. METHODS: A randomised, controlled trial was conducted in 80 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery using DLT or EZB for one lung ventilation (German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00014816). The objective of the study was to compare the clinical performance of EZB with DLT. Primary endpoint was total time to obtain successful one lung ventilation. Secondary endpoints were time subsections, quality of lung collapse, difficulty of intubation, any complications during the procedure, incidence of objective trauma of the oropharynx and supraglottic space and intubation-related subjective symptoms. RESULTS: 74 patients were included, DLT group (n = 38), EZB group (n = 36). Median total time to obtain one lung ventilation [IQR] in the DLT group was 234 s [207 to 294] versus 298 s [243 to 369] in the EZB group (P = 0.007). Median total time was relevantly influenced by different preparation times. Quality of lung collapse was equal in both groups, DLT group 89.5% were excellent vs. 83.3% in the EZB group (P = 0.444). Inadequate lung collapse in five patients of the EZB group resulted in unsuccessful repositioning attempts and secondary DLT placement. Endoscopic examinations revealed significantly more carina trauma (P = 0.047) and subglottic haemorrhage (P = 0.047) in the DLT group. Postoperative subjective symptoms (sore throat, hoarseness) were more common in the DLT group, as were speech problems. CONCLUSIONS: Using EZB prima facie results in prolonged time to obtain one lung ventilation with equal quality of lung collapse for the thoracic surgeon. If preparation times are omitted in the analysis, the time difference is statistically and clinically not relevant. Our data showed only little evidence for reducing objective airway trauma as well as subjective complaints. In summary both procedures were comparable in terms of times and clinical applicability. Therefore decisions for DLT or EZB should depend more on individual experience, in-house equipment and the individual patient, than on any times that are neither clinically significant nor relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00014816 , prospectively registered on 07.06.2018.

Non-incisional pleurectomy/decortication for malignant mesothelioma after cardiac surgery.

A 70-year-old man diagnosed with right-sided malignant epithelial pleural mesothelioma, underwent pleurectomy/decortication after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. He had a history of mitral valve replacement and maze procedure with median sternotomy, and the procedures resulted in strong adhesion from the apex to the mediastinal side. In particular, the peeling of the area where the tumor invaded the pericardium required the most attention; however, the involved pericardium could be partially resected without damaging the right atrium. Finally, en bloc macroscopic complete resection with the entire pleura was successfully performed without conversion to extrapleural pneumonectomy.

Endobronchial Intubation to Facilitate Extraluminal Bronchial Blocker Placement in Young Children: A Retrospective Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: Extraluminal bronchial blocker placement has become a well-accepted approach to one-lung ventilation in young children. In some cases, technical issues with placement may require alternative approaches to correct bronchial blocker positioning. The primary aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with using endobronchial intubation to facilitate extraluminal bronchial blocker placement in young children. DESIGN: Single-center case series of pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation using a bronchial blocker. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric patients < three years of age undergoing thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation who underwent bronchial blocker placement using endobronchial intubation to facilitate blocker placement. In all patients, the bronchial blocker was inserted through a selectively mainstemmed endotracheal tube to facilitate blocker positioning. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified after a query of the local electronic health record. There were five right-sided and ten left-sided placements in this cohort. Bronchial blocker placement was successful in 14 of 15 patients using endobronchial intubation to facilitate bronchial blocker placement. In one patient, the bronchial blocker was discovered in the nonsurgical bronchus, following placement with this technique. The bronchial blocker was repositioned manually into the desired mainstem bronchus prior to lateral positioning. CONCLUSIONS: Mainstem intubation can be used to facilitate bronchial blocker placement in young children and represents an alternative approach to extraluminal bronchial blocker placement.

Port Placement in Robotic Thoracic Surgery for Inferior Mediastinal Tumors.

Robotic surgery for inferior mediastinal tumors located below the inferior vein is rare. The difficulty of resection varies depending on port placement and approach, especially on the left side. Considering that we have tried 3 different approaches for left inferior mediastinal tumors, we identify the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The approach from 3 arms and 1 assist placed on the ventral side of the inferior angle of the scapula is the best access for inferior mediastinal tumors. If the Si system is used, the patient cart should approach from the caudal side and dock on the dorsal side.

A 23-year experience with the reversed elephant trunk technique for staged repair of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: The reversed elephant trunk technique permits staged repair of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm in patients whose distal (ie, descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal) aorta is symptomatic or disproportionately large compared with their proximal aorta (ie, ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch). We present our 23-year experience with the reversed elephant trunk approach. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2017, 94 patients (median age 62 [46-69] years) underwent stage 1 reversed elephant trunk repair of the distal aorta. Fifty-three patients (56%) had aortic dissection, and 31 patients (33%) had heritable thoracic aortic disease. Eighty-eight operations (94%) were Crawford extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Twenty-seven patients (29%) underwent subsequent stage 2 repair of the proximal aorta; 14 patients (52%) required redo median sternotomy. The median time between the stage 1 and 2 operations was 18.8 (4.8-69.3) months. RESULTS: The operative mortality was 10% (9/94) for stage 1 repairs and 4% (1/27) for stage 2 repairs; 1 patient with heritable thoracic aortic disease died after stage 1 repair (1/31, 3%), and 1 patient died after stage 2 repair (1/13, 8%). Two patients (2%) had ruptures after stage 1 repair; 1 resulted in death, and 1 precipitated emergency stage 2 repair. In total, 36 patients (38%) who survived stage 1 repair died before stage 2 reversed elephant trunk completion repair could be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Managing extensive aortic aneurysm with the 2-stage reversed elephant trunk technique yields acceptable short-term outcomes. This technique is useful for the reversed elephant trunk in patients who require distal aortic repair before proximal repair and is particularly effective in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. The low number of patients returning for completion repair is concerning. Rigorous surveillance is needed.

Association between prehospital transfer distance and surgical mortality in emergency thoracic aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there is an association between prehospital transfer distance and surgical mortality in emergency thoracic aortic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a national clinical database in Japan was conducted. Patients who underwent emergency thoracic aortic surgery from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, were included. Patients with type B dissection were excluded. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between prehospital transfer distance and surgical mortality. In addition, an instrumental variable analysis was performed to address unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: A total of 12,004 patients underwent emergency thoracic aortic surgeries at 495 hospitals. Surgical mortality was 13.8%. The risk-adjusted mortality odds ratio for standardized distance (mean 12.8 km, standard deviation 15.2 km) was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.01; P = .09). Instrumental variable analysis did not reveal a significant association between transfer distance and surgical mortality as well. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association was found between surgical mortality and prehospital transfer distance in emergency thoracic aortic surgery cases. Suspected cases of acute thoracic aortic syndrome may be transferred safely to distant high-volume hospitals.